For long-time readers and followers, they know that I own a few websites or publishing places (see a full list here). With so many places to publish to, you might wonder why not use only one big blog on WordPress? Well, I’m glad you asked. You’ll find most of the answers on the following diagram.
As you can see, each place fills a different role. Think of them as publishing channels. I prefer to have many focused places with content directed to a specific crowd over having a single channel full of seemingly unrelated posts. But there is more to it: I love using different tools and services. Each have their strengths and weakness, a specific set of features. That’s the thing that drives me the most for using different publishing platforms.
Let’s put aside « link posts » (like this one) for a minute or two; the time required to read this article. Recently, I noticed that the use of links in published content varies a lot from one author to another. Some bloggers or writers use a lot of links while others barely include any in their published content. I thought that was fascinating, and I started to think about my own links usage.
Was Internet supposed to be about cross-referencing content, a mesh of knowledge? It was and it still is. Links come from researching on a subject, on a topic or event. They’re not free. They need some processing time to gather, read, grade, curate, comment and store for future reference. Links processing is worth it.
Personally, I’m a « put as many links as possible » type of guy. I would argue that references add value to an article beside the basic obligation of referring to sources. Links can refer to contextual information. They can also help support some justification for a given stance on a subject. They can help the reader better position an article with others on the same subject. Links are powerful.
Sure there is a risk of prematurely losing the reader as he might go read the referenced article, leaving behind my article, though. I think the added value is worth it, though. Are you still with me? Yes? Great. Thank you for reading this article.
Recently, I had a chance to read and participate in two different discussions about which app, feature or service is better for a specific task or use case. In the first case, someone was asking about Ulysses handling of Markdown links. The question triggered a really enlightening discussion about how Ulysses, and many more writing apps for that matter, was good or not at certain things like Markdown handling in general1. On the second case, Lee Peterson expose his disdain for being forced into using the block-based Gutenberg editor, replacing the venerable classic editor. Again, a simple blog post triggering a great exchange about where WordPress seems to be heading2.
On the subject of Ulysses, I usually like the way Ulysses handles Markdown. I prefer not seeing Markdown tags while writing in Ulysses. But, I would certainly like to see an option where we can toggle this feature on and off, in which case Markdown would be shown in all its glory. On the Gutenberg editor, I must say that I didn’t like it at first. Eventually, it grew on me and today I wouldn’t go back. Block-based editor is also the way Craft is doing its magic.
At the end of the day, It doesn’t matter who’s right or who’s wrong, as long as everybody finds their best app for the task at hand.
I’m a big fan of Ulysses, but sure there are areas where improvements would be welcomed. Once such example is the publishing workflow.↩︎
The idea of introducing Stories on WordPress.com is simply stupid. I don’t want WordPress to copy Snapchat or Instagram.↩︎
I saw someone on Micro.blog that is using write.as for publishing a blog. After spending a few minutes on the blog and on write.as website, I find it very tempting; it’s clean, super simple, well thought out. And cheap. Maybe I should try it? Or maybe not. I’m already spread too thin. I feel it would be another rabbit hole. If all my current platforms were fully satisfying, I would’t be looking at other places.
I could at the very least open a free account, and see if my impressions are valid.
Guilty of Numeric Narcissism — Why I Subscribe to My Own RSS Feeds
Did you know that I subscribe to my own RSS feed? Yep, the one that are automatically generated from my own websites. Why, you might ask? Well, there are a few reasons for this seemingly narcissist behaviour.
Reason #1: I want to see what my readers are seeing from their preferred RSS readers. I think it’s important to get a sense of what people are seeing from their perspective. I cannot count how many issues I found with my content or feeds this way. I use News Explorer1, Reeder2, Newsify and lately I added NetNewsWire.
Reason #2: It’s a good way to test RSS reader apps. For the purpose of looking at my own content, the winner is Newsify. The following screenshot shows my preferred view setting. All the feeds items are intertwined. Content is shown from the most recent to the older content. It’s like reading a newspaper. My RSS feeds are setup to publish posts content entirely; no excerpt. Since I don’t allow ads on my websites, it doesn’t matter if readers are not hitting my websites directly and stay in their RSS readers to consume my content.
Reason #3: From time to time, I do take a screenshot for my archives. These are important to me. One day, I’ll look back and be able to see what it was like to be a content creator. On my iPad, I have a shortcut that helps me to automate a portion of this task. with the upcoming iOS 14.5, there is a new shortcut action that allows for automatic screenshot, this will help me to automate the process entirely.
One list thing, do you know about RSSmix? This free service allows you to create a super-feed made of individual RSS feeds. I create one with my own RSS feeds: Numeric Citizen RSS feeds. You’ll get all my content in your RSS feed reader. How cool is that?
News Explorer is my go-to RSS reader for all my needs.↩︎
Before NewsExploer, Reeder was my long time RSS reader.↩︎